Mirror

Responsive e-commerce design

Target User

Savvy online shoppers looking for fashion options, fit and value from an existing brand website.

Goal

To provide customers with a quick and easy search for a clothing item, checkout and delivery options with a mid-fidelity prototype.

My Role

User Research, information architecture, interaction design, branding, and UI Design.

Research

User Interviews
Persona
Empathy Map
Storyboard

Strategy / IA

Card sorting
Sitemap
User flow
Task flow

UX / UI

Responsive wireframes
Prototypes
Logo design
Key website screens
Style tile
UI Kit

Iteration and
Implementation

Usability testing
Affinity map

Background

Mirror is a global chain with over 400 stores in 32 countries providing customers with quality fashion at affordable prices. The website has been long neglected and urgently needs a refresh and update to meet current user needs. This redesign is critical to Mirror’s future success. The site must be competitive with other retail websites like Uniqlo, H&M, and Old Navy.

“Mirror is all about having clothing accessible for everyone with good prices and a variety of styles.”

Research

Objectives

  • Discover on-site and on-line shopping patterns
  • Key challenges for clothing shoppers
  • Key challenges for online clothing shoppers

Methodology

  • Secondary research on e-commerce markets and business models
  • User interviews
  • Synthesize key findings

User interviews

In person interviews were conducted with extracted findings below:

Fit is #1

  • How clothes fit is first priority for all shoppers followed by style, price, and value.

Everyone uses the internet

  • 100% of respondents use the internet to research and compare before buying.

Online shopping is imperfect

  • 100% of respondent have purchased items online.
  • Buying clothes online can be a gamble. Clothing fit and deliveries are problematic.
  • 50% felt that returning items is a hassle

Shopper knows stores

  • Customers know where to shop for price, style, quality, and occasion.
  • Customers associate brands with price, quality, and shopping experience.
“I know my size, but there are boot-cuts, relaxed-fit, slim-fit, classic (styles)... I have to try them (jeans) on to see if they fit.”

“I just hate having to return things I bought online.”

User profile

I created a persona, empathy map and a storyboard from the collected data. The user experience and needs are guides throughout the design process.


“I shop online but I need to see and feel the clothes to make sure they fit at stores”


Storyboard

Storyboard summary:
Tanya enjoys shopping on the web and in stores. She knows what kind of clothes fit her and where to get them. She is a savvy shopper and confident about her internet skills. Function, style, and value matter a lot. The internet is for researching information before she buys. She checks out what’s new, sales, clearances, style, comparison shop, all without exerting much physical effort. Buying from websites have been okay for her, but it’s not as good as shopping in stores. She is wary about the fit of the clothes, receiving deliveries and quality. Unfortunately returning purchases is a routine part of buying online. Going to stores to try on clothes before buying is efficient for her to ensure fit and quality.

Information Architecture

I used card sorting to help design and evaluate the information architecture of the Mirror site. I needed to determine the structure, appropriate labels for categories and navigation. I then proceeded to generate a sitemap.

I created a task flow diagram combining the physical and digital user experience to determine a common path by most users of the Mirror site.


I used a user flow based on my persona to focus on entry to the site through to checkout.


I looked at various website hierarchies and how they convey the brand promise and experience before making wireframes.

Design

I started building wireframes of key webpages that reflected the user needs in Sketch.

Below are the responsive wireframes based on the website


UI design

I started with logo explorations and gathered feedback.

I proceeded to generate a preliminary style guide for the visual language and feel of the website after choosing the logo.

The next step was creating a high fidelity responsive UI of the landing page along with a UI kit for reference.

I then built the high fidelity web pages for the prototype and testing using InVision.

Iteration and Implementation

I recruited five interviewees to test the website prototype, both in person or remote video chats.

Interview findings

I used an affinity map to organize critical findings.


Here are key discoveries from the interviews

Successes

  • The website communicates the brand message instantly
  • Users did not have a learning curve using the site
  • Information was organized and easy to navigate

User Patterns

  • The top navigation bar was used most often
  • Users want to compare items
  • Users like color options to have correspond to preview pictures
  • Users are very cost conscious
  • Users are reluctant to be on a mailing list

Frictions

  • Users did not notice shipping rates and discounts
  • Users noticed inconsistent tax and delivery charges
  • Users don't want to sign up to membership.

Fixes

  • Communicate shipping fees and options better
  • Fix tax and shipping costs flow to appropriate checkout pages
  • Redistribute promotion banners and messages for more efficiency

Shipping fees and options are better communicated

I revised the taxes and shipping costs messages


Opportunities and recommendations

Opportunities

  • Nearly all the interviewees liked to compare products before buying. They want to use multiple tabs. Providing a comparison feature may potentially be an advantage for the website.
  • Mirror should adopt the current retail trend of click-to-brick. Shoppers buy online but pick up at a store near them. While at the store, they try on their items, exchange, refund, interact with customer service or even buy more.

Recommended user flow explorations

  • Color options with corresponding visuals
  • Further exploration of check out user flow
  • Build out other major website sections for testing
  • Explore delivery options to include pickup and provide more convenience to the customer

Conclusions

  • Internet shoppers are accustomed to current flows and features. Once the user is confident and trusts the primary navigation and function of the website, their attention shift to the bottom line — cost and fit.
  • Most retail websites provide beautiful visual and options for their customers. However, clothing fit is the primary concern for all customers. A website cannot offer the real feel and fit that customers want.
  • It was fascinating to learn how retailers construct their websites.